We deliver a comprehensive range of sophisticated, cost-effective business law services to entrepreneurial start-ups, middle market companies and Fortune 100 enterprises, as well as nonprofit and tax-exempt organizations and associations of every description.
A full service business firm, we advise on commercial, financial and transactional issues, including business formation, capital raising, mergers and acquisitions, recapitalizations and reorganizations, corporate succession planning and liquidity events.
Our industry experience is far-reaching, extending to construction, education, energy, financial services, government contracting, higher education, healthcare, IT, insurance, life sciences, manufacturing, transportation, real estate development, restaurants and hospitality, and technology, among numerous others.
From our growing Mid-Atlantic footprint, we serve clients regionally, nationally and globally.
On March 12, 2025, the staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance through a no-action letter and Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) provided clarity on verifying “accredited investor” status under Rule 506(c) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On February 20, 2025, Virginia’s General Assembly voted to pass Virginia House Bill 2094, the “High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act” (the “Act”). The Act is currently awaiting Governor Glenn Youngkin’s signature. If enacted, this legislation would become effective on July 1, 2026, and would be only the second of its kind among states thus far, second to Colorado. The Act aims to protect “consumers” from “algorithmic discrimination,” described as the “use of an artificial intelligence system that results in an unlawful differential treatment or impact that disfavors an individual or group of individuals on the basis of actual or perceived age, color, disability, ethnicity,” or other protected characteristics.
On March 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) announced that it will not impose penalties, fines, or pursue enforcement actions against U.S. companies, citizens, or their beneficial owners for failing to file beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reports, pursuant to the Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements final rule (31 C.F.R. 1010.380) (the “Reporting Rule”), the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) (31 U.S.C. § 5336), even after any forthcoming deadline extensions or changes to the Reporting Rule. Treasury’s announcement follows earlier guidance from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) (the Treasury bureau responsible for enforcing the CTA)—which suspended enforcement of the March 21, 2025, filing deadline.
On February 17, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas lifted the last remaining nationwide injunction against enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) previously issued in Smith v. US Dep’t of the Treasury, clearing the way for the law’s implementation. This marks a significant development following the U.S. Supreme Court’s January 23, 2025, order in McHenry v. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., which lifted a separate nationwide injunction issued by another Texas federal district court. However, due to delays in the Justice Department’s motion in Smith, the CTA’s implementation remained blocked nationwide until now.
On December 23, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted the government’s emergency motion for a temporary stay of a district court’s order and nationwide injunction against the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and its corresponding Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) Reporting Rule.
Following a Texas federal district court’s issuance of a nationwide injunction temporarily halting enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”), the U.S. government has filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, challenging the district court’s findings (found here). In response to both the national injunction and the appeal, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”), the agency responsible for enforcing the CTA, issued guidance (found here) clarifying that reporting companies are not currently required to file beneficial ownership information (“BOI”) reports and will not face liability for noncompliance “while the preliminary injunction remains in effect.”
On December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Merrick Garland (Civil Action No. 4:24-CV-478), issued a memorandum opinion and order granting a nationwide preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and its implementing regulations and staying the compliance deadline for reporting companies pending further order of the court.
In many ways, the labor market is as competitive as ever. Businesses continue to explore compensation packages, in addition to ordinary salary, that will help them attract, hire and retain talent. One method of compensation that a business often considers is awarding employees equity in the business.
On March 1, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama in National Small Business United et al. v. Janet Yellen et. al., Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB, held the Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”) to be unconstitutional. In this surprising decision, U.S. District Court Judge Liles C. Burke ruled “The CTA is unconstitutional because it cannot be justified as exercise of Congress’ enumerated powers.”
In many ways, the labor market is as competitive as ever. Businesses continue to explore compensation packages, in addition to ordinary salary, that will help them attract, hire and retain talent. One method of compensation that a business often considers is awarding employees equity in the business.
Parties to a bargain typically make representations and warranties (“RWs”) to one another. RWs expressly record the parties’ understanding as to the conditions and facts under which they enter into a deal. In an asset purchase or an M&A deal, they form a material part of the transaction and account for a significant portion of the negotiations.
Jordan Halle and Phil Bogart discuss the various types of business entities, general governance and ownership principles, and the pros and cons of choosing an entity type for a given purpose. The discussion also includes the federal income tax aspects of these entity types.
You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below.Send link by email
